The debate between Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., and CNN host John Berman highlights the ongoing legal battle surrounding President Donald Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to target members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua for deportation. This act, which was invoked by the administration hours before a federal judge granted a temporary restraining order preventing the deportation of five Venezuelans and ordering their plane back to the United States, has sparked controversy over its constitutionality.
The Trump administration’s decision to use this 200-year-old law raises questions about whether it is an appropriate tool for dealing with modern immigration issues. Critics argue that the act was intended to address threats from foreign enemies during wartime and should not be used as a means of deporting criminal immigrants.
Judge James E. Boasberg, who granted the temporary restraining order, has been accused by Rep. Burchett of being an “activist” judge engaging in political overreach. However, Berman counters that it is within the purview of federal judges to interpret and apply federal law. The debate between these two figures underscores the broader disagreement about the role of the judiciary in shaping immigration policy under President Trump’s administration.
As this legal battle continues, it remains to be seen whether the Alien Enemies Act will stand up to scrutiny and if its use is indeed constitutional. The outcome could have significant implications for future deportation efforts by the U.S. government, as well as the broader debate over immigration policy in America.
[Original Article](https://www.foxnews.com/media/republican-lawmaker-wrangles-cnn-host-over-judge-halting-deportation-flights) #republican #lawmaker #wrangles [Visit GhostAI](https://ghostai.pro/)
[Join our Discord](https://discord.com/invite/zgKZUJ6V8z)