The recent Senate hearing has raised concerns about the handling of sensitive national security information by Trump administration officials, particularly Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s decision to share details of a planned U.S. military operation in a group chat. This issue was brought into focus when more than a dozen senior US officials were found on an unauthorized Signal text chain that leaked to a journalist. Among them, Hegseth was the only one who shared operational details about upcoming strikes on Iran-backed Houthi forces in Yemen. The information included target locations, weapons being deployed, and attack sequencing.
The use of an unauthorized messaging app like Signal for government communications raises questions about the security measures taken by these officials to protect sensitive data. CIA Director John Ratcliffe and National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard testified that Hegseth and the Defense Department had classification authority, which could mean either he revealed classified information or declassified it beforehand.
Hegseth’s response to reporters about not texting war plans does little to alleviate these concerns. Democratic lawmakers and former national security officials argue that details of planned military operations have always been considered sensitive and should never be shared publicly, especially through unauthorized channels. This incident highlights the need for stricter guidelines on how government officials handle classified information and emphasizes the importance of secure communication methods within the administration.
[Original Article](https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/testimony-raises-questions-hegseths-handling-secrets-sensitive-communi-rcna193976) #testimony #raises #questions [Visit GhostAI](https://ghostai.pro/)
[Join our Discord](https://discord.com/invite/zgKZUJ6V8z)