Media: https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTcyYTQ4YTRmODhzZTcyZnl6NnRyMHk1MXcxMDlhc2YxcGdscnNwZ2tkeXJnbHBpcyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/S8GcpfugdEr0TqmoRB/giphy.gifTitle: Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces challenges in Senate as July 4 deadline looms
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” has been making headlines lately, with Congress facing an imminent deadline to pass it by President Donald Trump’s July 4th ultimatum. The Senate is signaling that changes are coming for this megabill, and as the clock ticks towards the deadline, the contours of those changes are beginning to take shape.
Senators met on Wednesday to discuss updates from committee chairs about proposed amendments to certain portions of the House-approved package. While few details have been finalized yet, senators received an overview of the general direction that provisions in the bill will be taking. As Sen. John Kennedy put it, “Imagine a jigsaw puzzle with 3,000 pieces and no picture. So that’s what we’re trying to put together.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune has stated that this bill aims to rein in the cost of government and put federal programs on a more sustainable fiscal path than ever before. He believes it will be “the biggest spending reduction, mandatory spending, in history,” working towards reducing costs significantly.
One major provision under scrutiny is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which oversees food assistance for low-income families. Sen. John Boozman, chairman of the Senate agriculture committee, signaled that there would be changes to lessen the burden on states imposed by the House’s SNAP proposal. Unlike the House bill requiring states to share 5% of the cost of SNAP, the Senate proposal does away with this requirement altogether. However, states with high error rates will still have an obligation to share costs.
Another change in the works is work requirements for families with young children who wish to qualify for SNAP benefits. The House bill implemented these requirements for families with children over 7 years old; however, under the Senate proposal, this threshold has been raised to include children over 10 years old instead. This shift means that the savings from SNAP changes in the bill will be approximately $20 billion less than what was initially proposed by the House.
The implications of these changes remain uncertain at this stage; however, it is clear that they represent a significant departure from previous versions of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” As Congress continues to navigate through the complexities of this megabill, we can expect more updates and amendments in the coming weeks. It remains to be seen how these changes will impact federal spending and programs moving forward.
In conclusion, Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces several challenges as it makes its way through the Senate. With a July 4th deadline looming, senators are working diligently to finalize amendments that could drastically alter the course of this legislation. As we await further developments, one thing is certain: the future of federal spending and programs hangs in the balance.
Source: [Original Article](https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/5-hold-trumps-big-beautiful-bill-senate/story?id=122752428) #trump’s
Check out my AI projects on Hugging Face, join our community on Discord, and explore my services at GhostAI!