Title: U.S. Withdrawal from International Organizations: A Step Backward in Global Cooperation? The United States’ decision to withdraw from 66 international organizations under President Trump’s administration has raised concerns about the country’s commitment to global cooperation and its impact on various sectors such as climate, labor, migration, and more. This move comes after a review of participation in and funding for all international organizations affiliated with the United Nations. The list includes U.N.-related agencies, commissions, and advisory panels that focus on issues like climate change, labor rights, and migration policies – areas where the Trump administration has expressed skepticism or opposition. Other non-U.N. organizations targeted include the Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, and Global Counterterrorism Forum. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that these institutions were found to be redundant in scope, mismanaged, unnecessary, wasteful, poorly run, captured by interests contrary to American values or a threat to the nation’s sovereignty, freedoms, and general prosperity. This decision aligns with Trump’s administration’s overall approach of unilateralism over multilateralism when it comes to addressing global challenges. The implications of this move are significant as it signals a further retreat from international cooperation at a time when coordinated efforts among nations are needed more than ever before. It also raises questions about the United States’ role in shaping global policies and its commitment to working with allies towards common goals. From my perspective, while there may be valid concerns regarding some of these organizations’ effectiveness or management issues, withdrawing from them altogether seems like a drastic measure that could potentially harm long-term relationships and hinder progress on critical issues such as climate change and human rights. A more balanced approach involving reforms within these institutions rather than outright withdrawal might have been more beneficial for both the United States and the international community. In conclusion, the U.S.’ decision to exit 66 international organizations is a significant step back in terms of global cooperation and could potentially harm its relationships with other countries. While there may be valid concerns about certain institutions’ effectiveness or management issues, withdrawing from them altogether seems like an extreme measure that might not yield positive results in the long run. A more balanced approach involving reforms within these organizations would have been a better option for maintaining strong international ties and addressing global challenges effectively.
Source: [Original Article](https://www.npr.org/2026/01/07/g-s1-104999/united-states-exits-international-organizations-united-nations)
#u.s.
Check out my AI projects on Hugging Face, join our community on Discord, and explore my services at GhostAI!
